Kohli’s curious Captaincy Decisions

Congrats Team India and Virat Kohli for a comprehensive win in the 1st Test of the Home series versus NewZealand. Virat has now  won 8 out of 15 Tests, with 2 losses and 5 draws.

Kohli 1st became Test Captain due to Dhoni’s injury in the 1st Test of the Australian tour in December 2014. Dhoni returned to captaincy for the next 2 Tests before abruptly retiring. Kohli took over as Test Captain for the 4th Test and thereafter has continued as India’s regular Test Captain. Under his captaincy India drew an away Test vs Bangladesh, won against Sri Lanka  2-1 (away), won 3-0 against South Africa 3-0(home) and won against west Indies 2-0 (away).

Now there will be an unprecedented 13 Tests in a row at home which is expected to further improve his Captaincy record, given India’s home strength.

Twin hundreds on Captaincy debut in Australia marked Virat out as a player who will not let captaincy affect his batting. Indeed in the second innings of that Adelaide Test, Virat played what many called the best 4th innings played at Australia. India needed 364 in 98 overs and never played for a draw. Virat’s 141 in 175 balls could have taken India to a famous win, but it was not to be as Australia fought back to reduce India from 242/2 to 315 all out. India and Virat won hearts though and ensured that unlike other tours where one left with despair, now the tour will end with promise.

Virat’s captaincy has been by and large applauded. He has been seen as a bold and decisive leader, in contrast to his predecessor Dhoni who was seen as defensive and often clueless. Yet, there have been some curious selection issues which need a closer look.

1 Karn Sharma playing the 1st test at Australia in the 2014 series ahead of Ashwin was baffling. He took 2-143 in 33 overs and 2-95 in 16 overs in both innings. He never played Test cricket again and has played only 2 ODI and 1 International T20. Now Karn has taken 66 wickets in 34 first class matches @28.87 with only 2 fivers.  Does that merit selection in the Indian touring side. Once in the squad, does that merit selection in the playing 11. India lost that Test by only 39 runs. Was Karn’s selection too much a gamble?

2 In his second Test as Captain, which was at Sydney versus Australia, India played Suresh Raina at Number 6 and Raina, a delightful ODI cricketer otherwise,failed his captain with a pair of ducks. For this Test, Rohit was promoted to No.3 and Pujara was dropped. The point is that Sydney is reputed for helping spin, so shouldnt 2 spinners have been played ? What was the point of bringing Raina back in the last Test of the series?

3  The enigmatic Rohit Sharma looks super when he bats well. The balance is classy and the unhurried time he gets to play the ball is just awesome. Unfortunately he has not shown consistency at all. To be fair, he probably has not got a full series at a settled spot. He has batted at 6, then pushed up to 3, dropped, brought back at 5, dropped again and brought back at 6.  Virat seems unsure where to play him. His selection has also brought in other complications like juggling the batting order and experimenting with Virat at 3, Rahane at 3 and Pujara as opener.

4 The curious case of Cheteswar Pujara . For some time it seemed as if Pujara was India’s replacement for Rahul Dravid. However his place in batting line up too was experimented with. Pujara was dropped, then even asked to open (as India was injury-hit), scored a hundred as opener before going back to number 3. He was dropped again and is now back as number 3. One has the feeling that he should be given a long rope at number 3, especially since now he is playing only Test Matches.

5 The 5 bowler theory. This theory was started by Virat in the one off Test versus Bangladesh and continued in the India-Sri Lanka away series which followed.  However who will be the 5th bowler was the issue. It was Harbhajan, then Binny, then Mishra. With fanfare Ashwin was promoted to Number 6 and he obliged his captain with 2 Test tons and it seemed as if the 5 bowler theory will stay. However suddenly India reverted back to 6 batsmen and 4 bowlers. The point is, why not simply say that the best 11 will be chosen depending on situation of series, ground conditions etc.

6 Dropping of Murali Vijay was also inexplicable. For a few years Vijay played only when either Sehwag or Gambhir were injured. He thereafter staked his independent claim on merit and became India’s consistent number 1 batsman. In the 2nd Test versus west indies at Kingston he was dropped and Rahul grabbed the chance, scoring 158. However in the next Test when Vijay was fit he was dropped. Logically if Rahul was to be persisted with on form, then Shikhar should have been dropped and not Vijay. In fact to compound the selection jigsaw puzzle even Pujara was dropped and the batting order went awry with Kohli at 3, Rahane at 4 and Sharma at 5.

Maybe Kohli is experimenting with different combinations before settling down to what he feels is the best. Horses for courses are an acceptable , rather probably an advisable selection policy. However it does seem that his methods of selection are the other extreme of Dhoni who preferred to go in with the same 11, irrespective of conditions.

Its still early days for Kohli as Test Skipper but he is here to stay and its only a matter of time before he becomes captain in all formats.  it would be interesting to revisit this article after say 2-3 years.

Do you agree that he has made the above mistakes ? Feedback is welcome


4 thoughts on “Kohli’s curious Captaincy Decisions

  1. Very interesting observations. I do think though that the 4-bowler theory is retrograde. On one side we lament that we lack a credible and consistent bowling attack, and on the other side, we pick just 4 of the best. This is especially detrimental while playing on hard Indian tracks that takes a toll on fast bowlers. Why not spread the load with 5 bowlers and increase their longevity? Also, Vijay has been dropped way too often. In my view, Vijay & Rahul should be India’s first choice opening pair, with Dhawan as a possible backup. Finally, I believe some bigger Gods are out there helping Rohit Sharma keep his place. So what if he is a sweet timer of the ball, but times it 1 out of 5 times? Someone has to go up to him and tell him “I am giving you 5 clear tests to you. You better get your average to 55 in those matches. If not, you are out”. All that stuff about not putting a gun on a player’s head is bunkum.

    Kohli is an aggressive captain, who will make his mistakes as often as any other captain. If we give him to settle, he will do a stellar job. My only fear is that Indian supporters will raise him into a demigod status, from where failure or failing is not ever an option – that usually is the beginning of a downward slide for any player.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thanks. This was a bit more difficult to write than my other pieces. much easier to simply say brave captain , bold captain etc etc. more difficult to find points of improvement in someone who is winning


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s